run.

　　Adding Cost to the Part May Be Unnecessarily Complex or OverDimensioned?

　　a part is dimensioned can make significant differences in tooling and problem.

　　Then, then

　　Would have ben able to quote the project at a lower count. The Tool was likely quoted to account for the diffical of holding that feature in print, Raising the Cost of the TOOL.

　　Series of Step Forms Going Through the Part, Which Was to Be Stamped from a Light-Gauge Material.

　　Tryout, Any Variation in Material Condition Coming Into the Tool Would Spell Trouble.

　　

　　Tool House Shipped The Tool and Proceeded to Do the Line Runoff at the Customer’s Shop.

　　, The Plant Manager Stopped at the Press to See What was going on.

　　. That would have caused downtime throughout the life of the too.

　　AS A Result of Easing the Callout Tolerance, The Home Line Runoff WAS OFF and Running.

　　

　　Which Was a bit Challenging. The Toolmaker Ended Up Making a Custom Rocker to get the part ass,

　　, But it was also a proplem that money not being away.

　　Bend Radii -Worked for the End Customer Assembly As Well as the Physics of the Tool.

　　This Feature, Which the Tooling Expert Had Recognized As Privematic and Costly, DROVE Up the Cost of the Tool and Nearly Delayed Critical Build Events.

　　Another Potential for a Manufactuality disconnect is in the part ’s party.

　　Exceptions Because Although The Dimensions We Challenging, They We Achievable. The Tool was designed, built, and the first-office-off was a relatively nice-length part.

　　Preferred Method in this situation — WAS Not An Option in this case,

　　Asked for a quote on a new version of the part. This time, the quote account for the bends and shear loops enCountered the first time design.

　　Revisiting the design brings happy ending. Sometimes unnecessary costs can be avoided.

　　

　　On the previous version of the part that obviously had no bearing on the part performance.

　　The Oem Removed Those Dimensions or Relabeled them As Reference Dimensions for Reference Purposes Only and Not To Be Reported.

　　Idea for a More Cost-Effective Way to Locate that Board, Eliminating the Troublesome, Metal Stamping Parts High-Maintenance Feature.

　　

　　

　　

　　In Addition, The Stamper Running The Tool was the Recipient of a Fine-Running Tool with the Dimensional Challenges It Experienced with the Tool ’s Predecessor.

　　Not Needed ONJustifiably Tight Tolerances on the Dimensions.

　　Without Open Dialogue with Tool Shops or Stampers with Tooling Experts, Will End up OverPaying for their Tooling and PART PRODUACTION.

　　And Production and Bring Huge Savings to Product Tooling and Production Cost. WHETHER that is Done with Internet Experse.

　　1. Excessively Tight Tolerances on Dimensions Not Critical to Part Function

　　2. Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD & T) Datum Structulaing that is not well thoughtal stamping parts and often is contributioning

　　3. Form Features that Stretch or Exceeed The PHYSICS of the Part Material